Context
In June 2017, new anti-torture legislation came into force in Mexico, marking a milestone in the development of rule of law in the country. It prohibits all use of torture. Evidence obtained under torture is no longer admissible, and torture itself a punishable offence for which the perpetrators and their superiors are liable under criminal law.
However, implementing the new legislation presents a challenge for the Mexican Government. According to United Nations (UN) reports, the use of torture is general practice in Mexico. Convictions are often based on confessions obtained under torture. The Mexican Ministry of the Interior has admitted to misconduct and torture. It has intimidated people and extorted confessions if, for example, they were suspected of having links to organised crime. Torture methods are also used in cases of everyday crime and to quash social protest. This often affects people from poor and marginalised sections of the population, as well as human rights defenders, journalists, social activists and, depending on the federal state, also the indigenous population and smallholder farmers.
Unlike its predecessor and the laws of the individual states, the new anti-torture legislation complies with the definition of torture set out in the UN Convention against Torture. The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (HCHR), the Mexican Human Rights Commission (CNDH) and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) participated in drawing up the legislation.
Objective
Legal impunity is reduced, support has been provided to civil society, and the people’s confidence in the rule of law in Mexico is strengthened. Public prosecutors and police successfully apply the anti-torture legislation. International standards and proposals from civil society are taken into account.